Quote:
Originally Posted by RisingAgainst
As mentioned in the shoutbox, I enjoyed the read, thanks again and enjoy the vacation bro.
|
Thanks for the comments...the shoutbox, PMs, emails, LeanBulkers, AXholes, DAers, MANiacs, and BB.com-ers have all been extremely gracious inviting the piece into their emails, etc... Your comments have been as rewarding as I could hope for.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmalover
Got it! Thank you very much. It's hard to believe this information is available free of charge. Great job and keep it coming..
|
Yup...I may opt to go to a print mag as many know after a year's time, and do an additional newsletter that would be an additional piece of info, but this change isn't anticipated for at least a year's time still.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddawg91
Another top notch edition! Thank you for answering 2 of my questions and BTW, PM sent. Of course this as with the last issue will be printed multiple times and kept in a few places for re-reading!
Thanks as always for putting the time and effort into this and providing it to us free of chanrge!
|
Yeah, the Q&A is usually dictated by how many times I get asked the same question because there are likely people asking the same things, so it has been adopted into this format so it can reach many people at once. Yeah, you guys usually announce your questions, BUT I continue to keep them completely confidential UNLESS it is ok'd by the author. I think 3 or 4 of you identified which questions were yours in the Issue 1 Feedback thread.
The latter comments in your review are VERY flattering and are what make putting information out well worth it. While it takes time and effort, YES...it is something that needs to be done.
Quote:
Originally Posted by growstrong
GOt it doc! looks great! love what you did with the LB section, more specific this time! Great work!
|
Yes, it was time to expand traffic to this site. There are 23,000 people subscribed to the newsletter - between priority membership (one condition: signing up at lean bulk) + its forthcoming benefits (explained at a later point) will hopefully be a draw...plus the quality information here as compare to the pointless bickering etc... that goes on at other sites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by snakemw
This is issue was great D. The Formestane was the best write up too me. I am going to go back and reread later today i am about to go the gym.
Oh yeah i would never have guessed that is what NERD meant.
|
Well, let's see how many people gain entrance into my Nearly Egotistical group shall we? This will likely be more selective than IFFI even.
Formestane was an in-depth look article (Glycocyamine and 6-Bromo will be in issue 3 in pretty in-depth fashion). The issues will continue to improve - that is my goal. I am happy everyone liked issue 2 > issue 1 as this was slightly more scientific in spots (but I tried to offer pictorials as much as I thought things might be challenging - I3C blocking of estrogen metabolite and 6-Bromo variations - compeititive vs. non-competitive inbitors of aromatase).
I think issue 3 will trump issue 2 btw. Keep reading and enjoy!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by transXisomer
Same here, the formestane piece was really good, im looking forward to next issue especially to see how the testing with the 6-bromo goes
Great issue, I liked it better than the last one, going to reread it later today as well 
|
As above. I am hoping to do some REAL whopping articles for this one forthcoming. I merely hinted at issue 3 - you guys have NO idea!
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotTest
Another excellent issue by the Doc!
 <---standing
It is great to actually read articles about supplements that are approached unbiasly with solid research, and not advertisement hype!
 Man, I was hoping to hear the results of the 6-Bromo (HDX2) study. I'm running some now with an Epi pulse and will be taking it through PCT.
Couple questions Doc...
Why not a group on the 6-Bromo (HDX2) only?
Is the I3C for PCT ONLY and what is the recommended DOSING?
Keep the info coming Doc.
I'm going back to read the issue again.
|
No hype here, but I did throw a company ad at you guys that I hope you didn't see as overwhelming (1 page of 43) - that exists in all the other muscle rags / newsletters on the market. Time to take a stand - tell 'em you want the CU, the prime source of body composition reading material on the market today. Where Science and the Real World Meet! (TM)
ANyway on to your questions.
6-Bromo has had data behind it for the last 2 years solo and it is undoubtedly a decent product, BUT even it has some answers left unsaid with 6-Bromotest metabolites...so, this isn't the last time you have seen 6-Bromo. You will see information on 6-Bromo for sure. It is pertinent, trust me, and you will be mezmorized by what I think we'll see as the results (something competitors don't want you to see and something actual sellers of 6-Bromo products are fearful about if it happens to go awry), but we still have a few weeks and it will be pontificated about in the issue.
I3C is ONLY recommended as potential "necessity" for "Off" cycle, however it will be explored in September's issue of Intelligent Design Magazine BY ME - so please check that out as well. Designer's Magazine is free as well though they haven't seen an article by me since PCT: ACV which started the I3C ball rolling and why a couple products have cropped up with it in them finally as opposed to DIM. But really, look for that ingredient to be completely exposed in the ID tell-all piece.
Mind you, it is not going to play a detrimental role if used on cycle, but it is not necessary.
Is there anything I can do to calm your mind about 6-Bromo usage until CU Issue 3? I am bummed that you need info now and you didn't gain it from that issue.
D_