Quote:
Originally Posted by alden003
It was in the current issue of Muscular Development magazine. It was in the Steroid Law section. That artical was written before the 24th so most of it was speculation of what may and can happen. The thing is that this will be the first time that they will use the original ban parameters of how a compound relates to testosterone to ban that compound. If everything goes the way they hope it will make banning other compounds very easy for them. This maybe why they stared with Phera, Tren, and 1,4 AD prohormones first as it will be easy to relate them to testosterone. Also, a ban of Tren ban products will make it easy to include progesterone based PH's as well. As soon as they have set a president with these PH's it will only be a matter of time before they go after the rest. 
|
Guys, I started writing about this back in the first week of May, less that 2 weeks after the comment draft was announced. If you recall, I wrote that a very good source of mine at the FDA told me unofficially that the DEA and Justice Dept WILL PROSECUTE a supplement company distributing a PH that is/are on the banned list.
The FDA, DEA, and Justice have decided it is time to send a message. The legislation has not detered the manufacture and distribution of PH. The "banned list" has not stopped companies from finding loop holes. The manner in which the agencies involved feel the message can be most forcefully delivered is by prosecuting. This will, in their mind, send a warning shot to the industry.
This will happen. A test case is being developed as I write. It will be very public and the media will make it a complete circus. The unlucky folks will be made out to be "drug dealers" of the worst kind who are putting the public and unsuspecting teens at risk.
Mark it down. It will happen.
Regards,