PH with least amount of supporting supps

**snakemw** · 07-12-2007, 06:05 PM

Not sure yet, but was thinking of running a cycle in the next month or so of something. i was wanting to run 3-AD but it doesnt seem like it is going to be out any time soon. As the title states i was wondering what ph would require the least amount of supporting supps. i dont want a health risk i am just low on cash right now. I dont want to run anything so strong that HD-X2 and FX wont be enought for P.C.T.

There might not be anything out there that fits the criteria. I havent really been studying the ph's in awhile.

muad33b · 07-13-2007, 01:34 PM

BOLD? Although it might be pricey depending on the dosage... I'm sure Voo/RA can advise you better here, but I was under the impression that this was mild (in terms of shutdown) yet effective non-methyl...

UNCfan1 · 07-13-2007, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snakemw

Not sure yet, but was thinking of running a cycle in the next month or so of something. i was wanting to run 3-AD but it doesnt seem like it is going to be out any time soon. As the title states i was wondering what ph would require the least amount of supporting supps. i dont want a health risk i am just low on cash right now. I dont want to run anything so strong that HD-X2 and FX wont be enought for P.C.T.

There might not be anything out there that fits the criteria. I havent really been studying the ph's in awhile.

Jake IMO and in my own experience Halodrol, Propadrol u could run the Mass Stack and liver support for the Halodrol. Just the mass stack with Prop. Hell u could run those together and still be fine with the mass stack and liver protection. I never had any neg issues with those compounds.

Epi type of product u could run the mass stack on and liver protection.

**dinoiii** · 07-13-2007, 05:06 PM

Well snake-man,

Unsure if you want to wait until August 10th, but my second edition of the CU will actually cue people in on a little experiment of my own I am doing that is, VERY PRO-T/ANTI-E and the best part...REQUIRES NO SUPPORT SUPPS!!!

There's also going to be a bulk PCC you may also want to consider if further cutting/recomp are in your future.

These are NOT supplement cycles and such that you would see mainstream, however, likely infinitely more effective.

D_

ddawg91 · 07-13-2007, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinoiii

Well snake-man,

Unsure if you want to wait until August 10th, but my second edition of the CU will actually cue people in on a little experiment of my own I am doing that is, VERY PRO-T/ANTI-E and the best part...REQUIRES NO SUPPORT SUPPS!!!

There's also going to be a bulk PCC you may also want to consider if further cutting/recomp are in your future.

These are NOT supplement cycles and such that you would see mainstream, however, likely infinitely more effective.

D_

What a tease!

jbodybuilder · 07-13-2007, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UNCfan1

Jake IMO and in my own experience Halodrol, Propadrol u could run the Mass Stack and liver support for the Halodrol. Just the mass stack with Prop. Hell u could run those together and still be fine with the mass stack and liver protection. I never had any neg issues with those compounds.

Epi type of product u could run the mass stack on and liver protection.

Mike beat me to it

I must say that I am very curious as to what dinoiii is cooking up! Looking forward to it.

lionelxxl · 07-13-2007, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinoiii

Well snake-man,

Unsure if you want to wait until August 10th, but my second edition of the CU will actually cue people in on a little experiment of my own I am doing that is, VERY PRO-T/ANTI-E and the best part...REQUIRES NO SUPPORT SUPPS!!!

There's also going to be a bulk PCC you may also want to consider if further cutting/recomp are in your future.

These are NOT supplement cycles and such that you would see mainstream, however, likely infinitely more effective.

D_

BRING IT!! Its gonna be interesting D. Thanks for starting this and i'm really looking forward to this.

lionelxxl · 07-13-2007, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snakemw

Not sure yet, but was thinking of running a cycle in the next month or so of something. i was wanting to run 3-AD but it doesnt seem like it is going to be out any time soon. As the title states i was wondering what ph would require the least amount of supporting supps. i dont want a health risk i am just low on cash right now. I dont want to run anything so strong that HD-X2 and FX wont be enought for P.C.T.

There might not be anything out there that fits the criteria. I havent really been studying the ph's in awhile.

Snake, not sure if you believe in pulsing but you COULD try that IMO if you are reluctant to spend on PCT supps.

**JrBirdMan** · 07-13-2007, 09:50 PM

for a solo PH run with low sides and low support supps I vote for Propadrol by a long shot. non-methyl, has an anti-e in it. I loved it gave me great gains and endurace when I stacked it with phera.

**JrBirdMan** · 07-13-2007, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinoiii

Unsure if you want to wait until August 10th, but my second edition of the CU will actually cue people in on a little experiment of my own I am doing that is, VERY PRO-T/ANTI-E and the best part...REQUIRES NO SUPPORT SUPPS!!!

These are NOT supplement cycles and such that you would see mainstream, however, likely infinitely more effective.

D_

it this a PCT experiment or day to day recomp?